Redhouse and the Ancestors

In the last blog, we flashed through 125 000 years of exciting events in three pages. I will try to slacken the pace.

We discussed the possibility of the Phoenicians visiting the Swartkops River, and the panic this must have caused amongst the little band of Bushmen resident in our future Village.

By the Year Dot, approximately 24 generations after this dramatic event, the indigenous population had forgotten all about the Phoenicians and had resumed the even  tenor of their ways. Incidentally, there never was a Year Dot. The early monks who dreamt up the Anno Domini method of counting years had no concept of zero, so they went straight from 1BC to 1AD.

Life was chilled. As long as you avoided annoying the elephants, rhinos, hippos, lions, leopards and buffalo, and didn’t tread on a wide variety of reptiles, you could happily spend all day long eating oysters off the rocks. No champagne unfortunately, but they did drink Karri, a fermented honey mead.

According to legend, they discovered a hollow tree containing a small pool of water, into which honey had dripped from a hive above. It had fermented naturally. When they got over their hangovers, this seemed like a brilliant idea. In due course, different varieties of Karri became available, depending upon the flavour of the local honey, which of course depended upon which flowers the bees visited.

But this idyllic lifestyle was too good to last. People now termed Khoikhoi but who called themselves the Red People, decided to leave Botswana and head south.  Two thousand years ago they reached the sea.

Genetically, the Khoi and the San were related. Linguistically both relied on lots of clicks. Genetic studies indicate that 22 000 years ago the Khoisan constituted the largest group of hunter-gatherers on the planet. The San are the descendants of the first Homo sapiens, i.e. modern man. They have the oldest gene pattern of any existing people and it is thought that all other nationalities are descended from them.

But there was still a serious cultural distance between them. The Khoi looked down upon the Bushmen – the name San they gave them means “those who pick things up from the ground”.

The Khoi brought with them cattle and sheep, seriously displeasing personal habits and a bad attitude. They smeared animal fat over their bodies to exhibit their wealth. The richer, the smellier.

The concept of personal property was part of Khoi culture, those with large herds were the rich people, those without worked as servants. Whereas the San were the original socialists. Nobody owned anything of note. And if hungry, they felt zip about pinching a Khoi cow.

Despite divergent lifestyles, the Khoi and the San coexisted and probably interbred once they got to know each other.

Of course, the Khoisan formed the bedrock of the Coloured folk of South Africa. The numerous “click” languages were lost except within those remnants of the San people still found in areas of BotswanaNamibiaSouth AfricaAngolaZambiaZimbabwe and Lesotho. They were replaced by a version of Afrikaans which has to be the most expressive in the country.

It is well known that the Eastern Cape is the home of Black and Coloured rugby. Some clubs have been in existence for over 100 years. I have been to plenty of games in my role as driver of the referee’s getaway car. The ref being Michael, my son. We have been to places I didn’t know existed. You have no idea how popular rugby is out in the bundu!

Imagine the scene at a typical derby between two Coloured teams if the click language had prevailed.

The original is followed by the Afrikaans equivalent, and then the English translation.

The referee to the scrum: “Clack, click, clock” (“Crouch, Bind, Set”).

The spectators, advising the referee:  

“Clickity-click”, clickity-click” (”Hy hou! hy hou”). [“He won’t release the ball!”]

“Cluckity cluck!” (“Hy’s omkant! Hy’s omkant!”) [“That player is offside!”]

“Clockity clockity cluck” (“Jy blaas soos ‘n doos!”) [“You are not reffing very well!”]

“Clackity, clickity, clockity cluck! (“Vat jou fokken oë uit jou gat uit!”) [“We advise you to observe the game more closely!”]

Let me come back to the straight and narrow.

For the original inhabitants this was the first of many more intruders yet to come, of which more later.

It is very likely that a Khoikhoi clan took up residence at the site of the future Redhouse. They set up their huts and grew some crops. They didn’t move around as much as the San. They had clay pots  in which they stored food and Karri.

They lived in clans on what they considered their tribal territory. Every so often, they would decamp and move to another spot, perhaps in pursuit of grazing for their cattle.

Now, what earthly reason do I have for thinking that the Khoikhoi once lived in Redhouse, you may well ask.

Firstly, their descendants are still traversing the Village with their cattle, fertilising our greenery as they go!

Secondly, it is well known that Redhouse has been the home of hordes of egrets for ever and ever. Every trick in the book has been tried to get the egrets to leave the Village for as long as I can remember. Nets over the trees in which they live. Toy snakes placed strategically on the branches. Loud bangs. Shotgun blasts. Nothing will make them go away.

There are many kinds of egrets, but I guess ours are Bubulcus.Ibis. In Latin, Bubulcus means cowherd. These egrets like ticks. I reckon this is their ancestral home, harking back to the days of Khoi and their cattle. We are doomed to live forever with the incredible mess they make, not to mention the smell.

So what made the Khoi up sticks and head south? It so happens that even further north there was a great stirring.

Probably due to a rise in population, a slow but steady exodus of people began, moving eastwards and southwards out of the area where Cameroon is today, from about 3000BC.

It took them a while but in due course the first of the so-called Nguni speakers arrived in Northern Natal. It wasn’t so much an invasion as a slow advance into new lands looking for fertile soil to plant their crops and water for their cattle.

As the centuries passed, these people comprising several tribal groups collectively called the AmaXhosa, and behind them many more tribes now lumped together as the AmaZulu, gradually filled up the east coast of South Africa.

Their encounters with the San and the Khoikhoi they found in their path cannot have been all that unfriendly. They absorbed some of them into their ranks which is why their language, isiXhosa, contains a few of the original San clicks. Nelson Mandela was of the royal house of the abaThembu, and his DNA test showed that he had Khoisan ancestry.

This gradual southward movement and social interaction between the San, the Khoikhoi and the advancing black tribes was a pretty laidback expedition. Bear in mind that they first entered northern Natal around  1AD, and it took until 800AD before the vanguard made it to the Fish River.

Let’s call it about 1000 km from the northern border of KZN to the Fish River. That’s an average trek of 1.25 kilometres per annum. Even our decrepit railway system moves faster than that!

Several more waves of immigrants followed and by 1500AD the land east of the Fish was well settled.

Elsewhere in the world a huge amount was going on.  During that 1500-year period, in Asia, Europe and the Americas, numerous empires rose and fell, major religions emerged for better or for worse, dreadful plagues swept the world from time to time, millions upon millions of people were wiped out by warfare, the Dark Ages descended, China invented paper and gunpowder, eventually the Renaissance enlightened the dismal scene, America got “discovered” and, more importantly for this romantic series, Vasco da Gama made it round the Cape to India.

Where would you have rather been 1000 years ago? Merry England, or the Eastern Cape? Read on!

If you are of European descent, and you could go back 40 generations in your time machine to visit your ancestor, the chances are that you would be absolutely appalled at what you found.

Let’s assume a man of middle age (in those days probably between 35 and 40). By the law of averages he would have been a serf, bound to his master’s land for life. Do you really think you are directly descended from William the Conqueror?

Being a serf meant that his daily grind was dictated by the local baron, who could do with him and his family as he wished. This included handing over his daughter to his lordship on the eve of her wedding day, the so-called droit du seigneur!

When you introduced yourself, shivering in the pouring rain of a typical English summer, he might have opened his gob to reply, and you would have been greeted with a mouthful of broken and missing teeth, seriously bad breath and a hacking cough brought on by the latest bout of plague.

You wouldn’t have been able to refuse his invitation to enter his odorous cottage, made of mud and timber and a thatched roof, with a fireplace in the middle of the single room. Don’t shriek if you see a rat and, yes, that itching really is a horde of fleas.

And  please don’t ask to go to the toilet!

However, if your great, great, plenty more greats, grandfather was part of the long, slow migration of the amaXhosa, well, what a pleasure. Hey ho, up at dawn to check on the cattle. That was the man’s job, and he was also in charge of making the Amasi, fermented milk, like yoghurt.

After that was done, and the women were busy tending the crops, making food, looking after children, skinnering and all the  other tasks they constantly  complain about, well, sit down with the amadoda and discuss affairs of state.

And if the urge is upon you, take a stroll a little way up the nearest kopje, check that no ill-intentioned serpent is lurking in the grass, crouch on your haunches, give thanks for the lovely view of rolling green hills dotted with your fat cattle, the lazy brown river flowing past your kraal, the bluest of skies, and enjoy what is so well described in that most earthy language, Afrikaans, a hearty boskak!

The Ruffians Game

In 1531, Sir Thomas Elyot wrote that “Footeballe is nothinge but beastlie furie and extreme violence”.

Before William Webb Ellis picked up the ball and ran with it, there were many brands of football; rules were few and differed from village to village; there are old engravings showing players handling the ball; a crude form of rugby had been played for centuries in England and probably elsewhere before WWE achieved immortal fame.

Sir Thomas would not change his mind if he could watch a modern game of rugby; the “beastlie furie” is mostly under control but extreme violence is part of the game; as a normal citizen, can you imagine being tackled by the likes of Bakkies Botha or Willem Alberts? It quite possible you might die on the spot!

Rugby players are tougher than ever but still seem to spend large portions of their short professional lives on the side lines through injury. And they only have about fifteen years at most to practise their trade and to build up sufficient funds to support life after rugby.

And life after rugby could last a long, and painful time.

An ancient Scottish verse sums up the “beauties of football” pretty well:

Bruised muscles and broken bones
Discordant strife and futile blows
Lamed in old age, then cripled withal
These are the beauties of football.

In 1845 rules were published based on the game played at Rugby School and have been evolving ever since.

Of course, in these modern times football is just that, aka soccer, the game played by more sportsmen and women than any other – although I think lawn bowlers might be in with a shout, there seem to be loads of “white ants” in the world.

Modern football was formalised when the Football Association came into being in 1863;  the so-called “beautiful game” is a demanding sport in which acting talent is mandatory, required for “diving” when the opposition comes too close, and dramatic sliding across the turf on those rare occasions when a goal is scored, and of course the jumping all over each other immediately after the slide;  sometimes tempers flare and the players bite each other; this has led to calls for players to be allowed to carry their kit onto the field as flailing handbags are more in keeping with the spirit of the game.

There is an old saying about rugby and soccer: “Football is a gentleman’s game played by ruffians, and rugby is a ruffian’s game played by gentlemen.”

Rugby developed into two codes; in 1895 rugby league broke away from rugby union over the question of payments to players; 100 years later rugby union finally came clean and declared itself professional as well.

Rugby union is played in 100 countries; in South Africa we are well acquainted with the top dozen international sides as they feature on TV frequently; a little known fact is that 94 countries actually competed to play in the 2007 Rugby World Cup; we just didn’t get to see the qualifying matches.

The All Blacks were on the cusp of breaking the 17 consecutive international wins record held by NZ and SA but were held to a draw by Australia in August this year; and of course the Springboks beat them last week to finally put paid to an 18 game unbeaten run; but in fact that record had been broken when Lithuania beat Serbia in 2010. One wonders what language the referee spoke.

Enough of history; what is the future of rugby?

South Africa is probably unique in that it relies on its school system to provide rugby players to the various franchises – that is, the private and former “Model C” schools, which cater for the white and increasingly black middle class segments of society.

Certainly there is little input from the thousands of largely dysfunctional black schools; there are some notable exceptions, where dedicated head masters and teachers have tried to build a rugby culture against all the odds.

Other countries rely on a well-structured club system in parallel with school systems.

Whatever the system in place, come the last year of school, many thousands of rugby players depart the sport as players, never to be seen again. In South Africa alone, this figure probably amounts to over 5 000 boys per annum.

Only a small fraction continue, and they do so because they have size, speed and some talent on their side; those who just aren’t big enough – and that includes most first team players – are lost to the game.

In my view, the finest rugby to be seen is between well matched and well coached school sides; they play for the honour of their schools, and for each other, and generally in the spirit of the game.

Once all these thousands leave the sport, the small remnant who take up rugby as a professional career are trained to the level required to provide today’s gladiatorial spectacles.

It stands to reason that a huge amount of talent is lost when all these guys leave school; what a pity for the sport; maybe weight-group rugby would keep them in the game?

According to International Rugby Board data, these are the top thirteen countries in terms of numbers of registered senior males – and here I reckon these numbers include members of rugby of rugby clubs, not necessarily active players:

Rugby stats

*population figures rounded off

Some might argue that New Zealand’s figures should include those of Tonga, Fiji, Samoa and the Cook Islands as that is where they find a fair percentage of their professional players; however, this doesn’t alter the rankings.

The total population from which rugby players is drawn is also not so simple to estimate; England has a population of 53.5 million, but the vast majority follow soccer, and the English Rugby League probably has as many followers as Union; South Africa has anywhere between 50 and 60 million yet it’s rugby base is probably not ten per cent of that figure.

The middle rankers on the list above are the interesting ones – I believe that Japan and the United States are climbing the ranks; they both have impressive numbers of senior players already, but the percentage of players is a small fraction of the total population.

Now that the Sevens game will be on display at the 2016 Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro, watch its popularity rise.

This could lead to an interesting future for the fifteen-man game; we have heard the cricketing pundits bewailing the effect the Twenty-over game is having on Test match attendances – will the same thing happen to Rugby Tests?

I think not – it is far more likely that Sevens will provide huge interest in Rugby Union in general; it is not beyond probability that the full scale game finds its way back to the Olympics as well – bear in mind that when rugby was last played in the full format at the Olympics, the USA took the gold medal twice, in 1920 and 1924.

All Japan and the USA have to do is work on that percentage figure; if Sevens is a hit in Rio, watch those figures rise dramatically!

Imagine the Eagles versus the Brave Blossoms in the Rugby World Cup Final while the All Blacks and Springboks watch glumly from the side-lines!